Talk:Toriel/In battle
< Back to page
Latest comment: 10 September 2021 by Jacky720 in topic Stalling and sparing are just the same in Toriel's battle
F-Sharp, wanna prove to me the player has to specifically spare or miss blows in order to progress Toriel's battle non-violently? I did see your unreasonably upset reply to me, and the need to undo my edit entirely might emphasise that feeling of yours. --Breakin'Benny (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Check Toriel. No dialogue. Spare Toriel. She says "...". QED.
- Also, even just as my personal opinion and not F-sharp's, I don't think the parenthetical was serious and I don't think the first line was that unreasonably upset.
- [REDACTED] Also Jacky720 (t|c) 11:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- You can still progress the battle via any action, including missing a strike on purpose. Obviously F-sharp is easy to anger because that's how children are. --Breakin'Benny (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, we already established that completely missing counts, and the page reflects that. However, using items or ACTing doesn't, so it would be unclear to label it as mere "stalling" or "surviving." [REDACTED] Also Jacky720 (t|c) 10:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- You can still progress the battle via any action, including missing a strike on purpose. Obviously F-sharp is easy to anger because that's how children are. --Breakin'Benny (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)