What I’m not going to waste is my time arguing with you about AI again
Well, SOMETHING from the UNDERTALE group would be appriciated.
"The AI did give a wrong answer as AIs tend to do"
big companies have done things that can get them in trouble, one (non-related) instance is collusion, which one scandal of which even happened in the canned tuna industry, in which one (large) company CEO went to jai
good
lets strop this conversation before it devolves too far
I said that after you said what you said, not before
Also do you know what “tend” means
It means “frequent”
Not “always”
So the copyright thing really wasn’t enough for you
Okay start writing the email
I mean I do understand you’re not deadset that it’s illegal just skeptical that it’s not illegal
Very skeptical
I just think that’s way too skeptical
I was talking to specifically Enderman but that may be a good idea
You're the one saying it wastes resources
It's a true fact but everything “wastes resources”
um actually
(Slight counterjection:
Resource-producing things)
Yes, but ai wastes a TON of recourses compared to everything else. Per day, ChatGPT uses around 340,000,000 Wh (Watt hours). While this site uses much less than that, though I don’t know specifics. As well, ChatGPT uses MILLIONS OF LIETERS OF WATER A DAY.
Humans use millions of liters of water a day, robophobes
They use resources to create the resources, right?
We humans need it. Ai doesn’t need to exist.
they make more resources than they use otherrwise why would they exist
technically we dont need to exist, the planet is fine without us
I don't really like robots much in their current state, but it is not fair how we treat them.
Better without us, we made the fucking AI
I was saying that ai doesn’t need to exist for us to thrive
yes although it makes things a lot less tedious, also individual uses of ai dont consume lots of energy-it just adds up, tragedy of the commons
No? Not an AI defender but that data is skewed (I can go into detail if you wish)
Ok