It seems that the general consensus is that wiki editing categories should be included in the awards. Again, I'm not an editor, so I can't really give that good of an input on this. However, I do want to present a few ideas for categories.
...I can't think of any more off the top of my head.
Any others that should be included?
distinguishing from the discussions category ↩︎
How about best optimization (shortening text and removing clutter while still carrying all the same important information)?
ironic lol
Also, I previously proposed a solution for this issue, making 2 awards for each catagory (as seen in a previous thread.)
I wasn't saying is get the award I was just suggesting one
Ok
I also have an idea for a "community's choice" award, where people have a chance to win an award that is not connected to any category in particular. I definitely want multiple people to be able to win it, but I suppose it would just be determined by pool size.
Let's say that the amount of winners that can be decided will be (Ceiling(No. of Candidates/3)).
So, the amount of Candidates, divided by three, rounded up.
So, if there's 2-3 candidates, there'll be one winner. With 4-6, there'll be 2, and with 7-9, there'll be 3.
I think 3 winners is a reasonable limit.
Great idea.
Trust me, I'm always right. /j
So if enough people vote for it I can win Most Evil and Homophobic award?
...That would be an unfair competition.
True, but would you vote for me if I was nominated for it?
...Damnit. Yes.
No negative categories lol
That's not a negative category though
Being homophobic is bad
Sounds pretty subjective though
Oh so this is what started it
Yep
