I’m one of 4 kids and I’m second youngest, so technically middle child.
(I am older than some of my friends)
wizard you're so old
no kidding he’s a wizard he’s old and wise
Old
Well being old comes with the way of the wizard
Yeah, I think it’s a fine headcannon, just not a good theory.
Another reason why you shouldn’t use she/her pronouns for ralsei, it’s the same for Kris most of the time.
People who misgender Kris’s main defense is, “it’s just a headcannon”
heya. dont ping me in these just to cause drama and such its dumb
Read through the main bit because i didint feel like reading through the replies, if anythings cleared up that i didint catxh then whatever.
this is mainly just interpreting things as something else, thats the main point of the thread here. Everyones gonna interpret things differently, thats whatever. Talking more about the dress thing, ralsei sounds like shes clarifying rather then giving kris the choise, mainly because of the exclamation mark ending the sentence then ralsei adding that on. Plus, if you say no, she seems a bit surprised and embarrassed compared to being really excited to the idea when you say yes. Thats how /i/ read the dialouge but its text on a screen so whatever.
AGAIN dont @ me in these please, i can read shit by myself if i wanna. I'm more then the trans ralsei guy, yknow.
I think it’s an interesting theory, I just need some more evidence for me to actually… yknow, say it’s true
I do not know how to explain this, but if you do not understand that there is a difference between people using gendered pronouns on the character who is nonbinary and they/them or otherwise literally textually transgender and the headcanoning of characters who at least in this thread people have been adamantly swearing is cis, and denying that the usage of they/them in a title Specific To Them has any indication of anything...? If you do not understand the difference, then I don't even know where to start.
look @Invidiatechdemo uhh
can we all just remember
that
uhh
people have opinions
and such
and just cause someone has an opinion that you dont agree with
dont mean you gotta publicly crucify them 
I’m pretty sure they’re just trying to explain the flaws in their argument
Friend approved
no yea i typed it before they sent that
A question: Why is it that it's 'publically crucifying' someone to disagree with them on a transgender headcanon sucking, but it's okay to go on another person's post about how they headcanon a character as trans to argue that they're cis/joke to someone you do not know that actually everyone is cis (that happened literally a day ago. You would know, because you were there, even if you weren't the person arguing.)
i have no fucking idea what the hell yorue on about 
but i have shit memory anyways
but uhh
im just saying
dont attack people cause they have diff opinions then you (NOT THAT THATS WHAT YOURE DOING IM JUST SAYING)
There
That's the difference
thanks for reading this
i actually wanted to hear your side of the aurgeement if it wasn't to much trouble
Isn't it a little hypocritical to go 'the reason is you put something controversial in your posts' when someone gets reasonably upset at someone acting weird toward a person doesn't know saying he has trans headcanons about character and then act like this over someone discussing flaws in an argument here in this thread...? It's simply not reciprocal, you are consistently favoring people who dislike trans headcanons, not speaking up when those people are deeply unpleasant and getting argumentative on said posts, and only speaking when someone who has trans hcs gets frustrated and mis-speaks or gets slightly testy.
Should the same level of 'you posted something with the deliberately inflammatory 'why i hate trans ralsei' header and expected people to not debate you' not also apply here?
Please understand: I also have a bad memory, but it does not erase the things I say to other people, or people keeping in mind things I have said prior in the context of future conversations.
a bit harsh but I see why you’d say it