Possibly moving the recurring "name is one of the names that prompts a unique response from the voice in the introduction during Chapter 1." trivia point over to Relationships to reduce trivia?

In recent times, we have been trying to reduce trivia points as much as possible, moving the info into the main article itself. This has largely been a success, with many important pages now having absolutely no trivia points.

However, there is one trivia point that has never been touched, which are the "[Article Name]'s name is one of the names that prompts a unique response from the voice in the introduction during Chapter 1." A lot of major articles such as Susie and Noelle have this as the sole trivia point, making it really stick out.

So my suggestion is to move these over to relationships, as they do suggest some minor relationship to the voice. It is a bit non-traditional for a relationship section, but we don't want to have all these characters' main story segments start off with info like this as it's admittedly not too related to their story (which would be what happens if it's moved to Chapter 1), and the pros of being able to delete the Trivia segment outweigh this imo.

Here's what it'd look like for the "normal" articles, and a unique new version for specifically Kris, Susie, and Noelle.

Thoughts?

That is a wonderful idea!

why would it be in relationships

it isnt indicative of any relationship other than the voice knowing characters in the game exist

@EvieMaybe Has suggested the idea of that text being in the Main story sections at best.

A relationships section doesn't make sense, especially when relationships are meant to be in the article character's perspective.

True, it is unusual for relationship sections, but it's still better than having one-point-only Trivia sections for main characters in my opinion. Main story could work as well, just would feel like starting off a bunch of Main story sections with this sort of content would feel weird considering it's of minimal importance. It could be done though.

I support this; given the lack of knowledge of the voice broadly, this sort of thing becomes significant from the perspective of the voice as a character. I don't know if I've worded this well...

Indeed I have. I do not think "Relationships" is the best way to describe what is essentially just an acknowledgement.

do we even have to put it in the various pages?

Yeah, definitely. It's a very specific subset of characters.

I'm realising that on the Introduction / Goner Maker page there is a table of Voice responses already. Maybe the real solution is just to clone that, given it is relevant to the Voice's characterisation? People think about this stuff a lot, and it would solve the problem, right?